Scott Pruitt , the nous of the Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) , is n’t on the dot what you ’d call subtle when it comes to his contempt for his own organization . In - between force out scientific adviser en masse shot and welcomingcoal lobbyistsin with candid arms , he ’s also spending $ 25,000 of taxpayer ’s money on a personal soundproof cubicle .
As is also well known , he ’s not a fan of using the words “ mood change ” – so much so , in fact , that hot off the heels of repealing theClean Power Plan , he ’s also resist to use the phraseat allin the EPA’sfour - year strategical mindset .
This plan for the near - future is meant to sketch how the EPA will protect human health , the environment , and the region from pollution and dangerously high levels of nursery flatulence emissions . The last fourth dimension this document was published back in 2014 , under the Obama administration , clime change was the top priority , and the idiom appeared over 40 times .
As first see byCNN , Pruitt ’s inaugural attempt at hashing out the late variation is essentially the antithesis of this – less a small change across administration , and more of a cataclysmal shift .
Pruitt ’s first priority is to “ rebalance ” the federal character in environmental regularisation . Once again , the melodic theme that the EPA has been overstep its bounds has come in up again , but what this really amounts to is this : state that bank more on fossil fuels than others do n’t like it that the EPA says they need to transition to clean energy . That ’s it .
second , the EPA apparently needs to get back to doing what it originally did – make certain air , land , and water remain neat .
Sounds gravid on paper , but if this really was the missionary post of the delegacy , then why attack the Waters of the United States ( WOTUS ) rule that helps to provide clean drinking water to million of mass ? Why , asother agencieshave done , nix fundamental befoulment studies ?
A mood counselor-at-law at the last global climate meridian in Marrakesh , Morocco . Ryan Rodrick Bailer / Shutterstock
This objective lens also imply that the focus on glasshouse gas emissions of tardy has been in error . unhappily , that ’s not how science works – it is n’t a static monolith , but a incessantly evolving thought process .
A lot more is have sex about the state of the environs and human wellness today than back in the 1970s when the EPA was found , and it ’s clear that climate change is the job that make everything worse , including pollution , human health , and ecologic collapse . If the EPA wants to protect the environs , it can not ignore glasshouse gases .
Again , at no dot in the 38 - page - long papers , does the phrase “ climate alteration ” look . Make no mistake about it , Pruitt wants to take the EPA back to the 1970s – and approximate by theseghastly photographsof what America attend like back then , a grim hereafter awaits .
